Here is no doubt that it's a fantastic tutorial for me.By using it the workflow are increasing rapidly.Actually i am looking this about two month.So i am very glad to find out it.
<a href="http://clippingcreationsindia.com/">clipping path service</a>
Hey, you’re tutorial is awsome & the result is dramatical, I love this style rendering.
I have a question, in donwload files, you give 5 files, how to produce those 3 images bellow from 3d max vray ?
thank you very much
friend, great tutorial, u're a big CG artist, I'm Diego, I've 16 years old, I'm brazilian and jewish guy and Friend of Matheus Passos, and Mazal Tov, and congratulations of ya renders, Shalom vShalom
Interesting workflow. Stumbled over this image of the same building - possibly 3d as well. @AkselAlvarez - is this a render you decided to create post-tutorial?
Great, great, great!!! Very useful tut. Thanks Ronen! I will take part in the forum exercise with pleasure)
@ronenbekerman Thanks Ronen! I'll be waiting for that post with a lot of interest. More or less in the same way I think that topic of "Workflows vs. Clients/Works" have to be considered as a whole. I mean, in every work's step in the creative field we have to be able to make changes and "corrections" at almost any time. Choosing the right technique is a matter of the final purpose, of course, despite there are good examples of good animations made using 2D illustration, have I to say. To solve that topic I guess is necessary to speak about the relationship with the Client. I'm architect and until this moment I didn't work as a architecture visualizer, so my experience comes from another fields and as Client of Arch-Viz. I think is really important achieve a good relation based on three elements: clear communication, clear 'decision making processes' and respect for the project's schedule. That is certainly a boring topic!
Great tutorial. That is great Ronen, what a fantastic one. I really impressed of what's the outlook of this Shipyard photo. I honestly don't know how to do this I only know basic photoshop and I get ashame of that fact. Thanks for this fantastic piece!
I absolutely have to agree with Daniel Hatton. I (today in fact) had exactly that problem, a piece of work that I'd done (against my advice) had to be completely changed because the vast majority of it was done in post production, not 3D. If we had done it in 3d, it wouldn't have been an issue to change anything.
Workflows aside however, this is some of the best photoshopping I've seen, very well done.
@ronenbekerman that was a good one. Thanks for the share.
Great tutorial, very similar to how I work tbh. A few tips and settings that I haven't used yet so I'll be giving those a try! Cheers.
You have an impeccable eye. Great share. I have one question. Why did you chose to face the little girl looking to the outside of your image (other than she was your reference photo)?
@ronenbekerman one of the greatest breakdowns of psd work seen so far. The otcome is so moody! =)cold, almost frightful corner on the dock..
Really nice work!! I think after see this Tutorial I've learnt more than I've expected. The most important thing is not to knew new tools, is to knew how to combine the basic tools that all of us knew at PS, basically thinking on a creative way. Thanks for this post!
For me, in terms of Pure 3D vs Post work is the fact that any changes, be it a slight angel change to a different chair can be very time consuming. I think the greatest advantage to pure 3d work is you can always add additional camera views at the end with relative ease.
That´s a great video from a great studio. I really like their work and style. Thanks for sharing, Ronen!
What a great work, i'm really impressed with the quality of this breakdown! Congratulations to PixelFlakes and Thank you Ronen for posting this article!
@emeliafallick Then you should definitely give the forum exercise a try... With more doing so this could be the chance to up the level of your photoshopping ;)
@Macker202 This is why I am personally still pondering the merits of each workflow and which I'll take on... perhaps both.
Marvin mentioned previously that this type of workflow does not fit all types of projects. When animation is needed - this is out of the question for sure, you'll have to do it mostly in 3d and just do basic color grading in post.
For fast jobs, where pre-selection of view points is part of the process and any new angle is considered a new image - then why care if you do it a new this way? it will still take a lot less then pre-building it all in 3d in the first place when you initially only planned for one image for example!
As much as I'd love to nail it all in 3d and then feel free to explore the scene and render any view... I find that the working conditions make it harder to keep to high standards.
Anyway... I'll give this scene a go on the forums ;) So should you!
@whitebirchstud Sure thing! I'm watching it now again ;) Thinking about where I'll take my version of it.
@whitebirchstud In architectural visualisation you always try and make things point to the main focus point, so I fully understand what you mean. But I think here the scene tells more of a story. She's waiting for somone. Also the light that reflects on her umbrella gives us the oppertunity to place a shadow on her making the scene slightly mysterious and open for viewer suggestion.
@AkselAlvarez I think you nailed it! and I'm about to post a new article related to what you mention here in a day or two ;) stay tuned...
@danieljhatton Totally agree, but you have to see what type of project you're working for. To get this type of detail in just 3D would take long render times, and ages in 3D as opposed to the hour it took us to do the base render. For an animation obviously it's a different case - but for one shot post can help a lot... Different per project :)
@ronenbekerman Another piece of artwork! What a great studio indeed! I'm looking forward to learn some of these techniques and apply them in my works..
Lasse Rode takes Unreal Engine for a good spin as he strives for photorealism using a real-time tool. He does this... more